Compendium of International Methods of Analysis for Vinegars

Download document

Method for 18O/16O isotope ratio determination of water in wine vinegar using isotopic mass spectrometry (Type II)

OIV-MA-VI-23 Method for 18O/16O isotope ratio determination of water in wine vinegar using isotopic mass spectrometry

Type II method

  1. Object/Scope of application

The method enables the determination of the 18O/16O isotope ratio of water in wine vinegar after equilibration with CO2, using isotope ratio mass spectrometry (IRMS).

  1. Definitions

 

18O/16O:Isotope ratio of oxygen 18 to oxygen 16 in a given sample.

δ18OV-SMOW:Relative scale for the expression of the isotope ratio of oxygen 18 to oxygen 16 in a given sample. δ18OV-SMOW is calculated according to the following equation:

using the V-SMOW standard as a reference for the relative δ scale.

  • BCR: Community Bureau of Reference
  • IAEA: International Atomic Energy Agency (Vienna, Austria)
  • IRMM: Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements
  • IRMS: Isotope Ratio Mass Spectrometry
  • m/z: Mass to charge ratio
  • NIST: U.S. National Institute of Standards & Technology
  • RM: Reference Material
  • V-SMOW: Vienna Standard Mean Ocean Water (18O/16O = RV-SMOW = 0.0020052)
  • GISP: Greenland Ice Sheet Precipitation
  • SLAP: Standard Light Antarctic Precipitation
  1. Principle

The technique described below is based on the isotopic equilibration of water in samples of wine vinegar with a CO2 gas standard, according to the following isotopic exchange reaction:

After equilibration, the carbon dioxide in the gaseous phase is used to analyse the 18O/16O isotopic ratio by means of Isotopic Ratio Mass Spectrometry (IRMS).

  1. Reagents and materials

The materials and consumables depend on the method used (see point 6).

The following reference materials, working solutions and consumables can be used:

4.1. Reference materials

Name

Issuing organisation

δ18O according to V-SMOW

V-SMOW, RM 8535

IAEA / NIST

0 ‰

BCR-659

IRMM

-7.18 ‰

GISP, RM 8536 

IAEA / NIST

-24.78 ‰

SLAP, RM 8537 

IAEA / NIST

-55.5 ‰

4.2. Working solutions

4.2.1.    Carbon dioxide (or carbonic anhydride) as a secondary reference gas for measurement (CAS N° 00124-38-9).

4.2.2.    Carbon dioxide used for equilibration (depending on the instrument this gas could be the same as that which is listed in 5.2.1 or, in the case of cylinders with continuous flow systems, a helium-carbon dioxide mixture can also be used).

4.2.3.    Working solutions with δ18OV-SMOW values calibrated according to international reference materials.

4.3. Consumables

Helium for analysis (CAS N° 07440-59-7)

 

  1. Apparatus

5.1. Isotope ratio mass spectrometer

The Isotope ratio mass spectrometer (IRMS) enables the determination of the relative contents of 180 and 16O in CO2 gas with an internal precision of 0.05‰. Internal precision is defined here as the difference between two measurements of the same sample of CO2.

The mass spectrometer designed for the determination of the isotopic composition of CO2 gas is generally equipped with a triple collector capable of simultaneously measuring the following ion currents:

m/z =

44 (12C16O16O)

m/z =

45 (13C16O16O and 12C17O16O)

m/z =

46 (12C16O18O, 12C17O17O and 13C17O16O)

When measuring the corresponding intensities, the 18O/16O isotopic ratio is determined from the m/z = 46 and m/z = 44 intensity ratios after conducting a series of corrections for the 12C17O17O and 13C17O16O isobaric species, whose contributions can be calculated from the actual intensity observed for m/z= 45 and from the usual isotopic abundances for 13C and 17O in nature.

The isotope ratio mass spectrometer must either be equipped with:

  • a double entry system (dual inlet system) to alternately measure the sample and a reference sample,
  • or a continuous flow system that transfers quantitatively the CO2 from the sample vials after equilibration and the CO2 standard gas into the mass spectrometer.

5.2. Equipment and materials

All equipment and materials used must satisfy the stated requirements of the method or of the apparatus used (as specified by the manufacturer). However, other equipment and materials of equivalent performance can also be used.

5.2.1.    Vials with septa appropriate for the system used

5.2.2.    Volumetric pipettes with appropriate tips

5.2.3.    Temperature control system to carry out the isotopic exchange reaction at a constant temperature (typically within 1°C)

5.2.4.    Vacuum pump (if needed for the system used)

5.2.5.    Autosampler (if needed for the system used)

5.2.6.    Syringes for sampling (if needed for the system used)

5.2.7.    GC Column to separate CO2 from other elementary gases (if needed for the system used)

5.2.8.    Water removal device (e.g. cryo-trap or selective permeable membranes)

  1. Preparation of the samples

Wine vinegar samples as well as reference materials are used for analysis without any pre-treatment. If the sample contains impurities, it should be filtered with a 0.22 μm pore diameter filter.

Preferably, the reference materials used for calibration and data correction should be placed at the beginning and at the end of each series and inserted after every ten samples.

  1. Procedure

The procedure generally used for the determination of the 18O/16O isotope ratio by means of equilibration of water with a CO2 working solution and subsequent analysis by IRMS is presented below. These procedures can be altered according to the apparatus and equipment used, given that various kinds of equilibration devices with different functions are available. The two main technical procedures for introduction of CO2 into the IRMS provide a dual inlet system and a continuous flow system respectively.

Note: all values given for volumes, temperatures, pressures and time periods are only indicative. Appropriate values must be obtained from specifications provided by the manufacturer or determined experimentally.

7.1. Manual equilibration

A defined volume of the sample/working solution is transferred into a flask using a pipette. The flask is then attached tightly to the manifold.

Each manifold is cooled down to below –80°C to deep-freeze the samples (manifolds equipped with capillary opening tubes do not require this freezing phase). Subsequently, the whole system is evacuated.

After reaching a stable vacuum, the CO2 resulting from the working solution in the round bottom flasks is distributed. For the equilibration process, each manifold is placed in a water-bath at 25°C ( 1°C) for 12 hours (overnight). It is crucial that the temperature of the water-bath is kept constant and homogeneous.

After the equilibration process is complete, the resulting CO2 is transferred from the flasks to the sample side bellow of the dual inlet system. The measurements are performed by comparing the isotope ratios of the CO2 contained in the sample side with those of the CO2 contained in the working solution side (gas

reference standard: CO2) of the dual inlet. This approach is repeated till the last sample of the sequence has been measured.

7.2. Use of automatic equilibration apparatus

A defined volume of the sample/working solution is transferred into a round bottom flask using a pipette. The flasks containing the sample are attached to the equilibration apparatus and cooled down to below –80°C to deep-freeze the samples (systems equipped with capillary opening tubes do not require this freezing step). Subsequently, the whole system is evacuated.

After reaching a stable vacuum, the CO2 resulting from the working solution in the round bottom flasks is distributed. Equilibrium is reached at a temperature of 22 1°C after a minimum period of 5 hours with moderate stirring (if possible). Since the equilibration duration depends on various parameters (e.g. the flask geometry, temperature, amount of stirring), the minimum equilibrium time required should be determined experimentally.

After the equilibration process is complete, the resulting CO2 is transferred from the flasks to the sample -side bellows of the dual inlet system. Analysis is carried out by comparing the isotope ratios of the CO2 contained in the sample side with those of the CO2 contained in the working-solution side of the dual inlet. This approach is repeated till the last sample of the sequence has been measured.

7.3. Manual preparation and automatic equilibration and analysis using a dual inlet system coupled to a continuous flow IRMS

A defined volume of sample/working solution (e.g. 200 μL) is transferred to a vial using a pipette. The open vials are then placed in a closed chamber filled with the CO2 used for equilibration (5.2.2). After several purges to eliminate any trace of air, the vials are closed and then placed on the thermal tray of the autosampler. The equilibration is reached after at least 8 hours at 40°C. Once the process of equilibration is complete, the CO2 obtained is dried and then transferred into the sample side of the dual inlet system. The measurements are performed by comparing the isotope ratios of the CO2 contained in the sample side and the working solution side (CO2 reference standard gas) of the dual inlet several times. This process is repeated until the last sample of the sequence has been measured.

7.4. Use of automatic equilibration apparatus by means of a continuous flow system

A defined volume of the sample/working solution is transferred into a vial using a pipette. The sample vials are placed into a temperature controlled tray.

A mixture of He and CO2 is added to the vials using a gas syringe. The CO2 remains in the top of the vials for equilibration.

Equilibrium is reached at a typical temperature of 30 1°C after a minimum period of 18 hours.

After the equilibration process is complete, the resulting CO2 is transferred by means of the continuous flow system into the mass spectrometer. The CO2 gas standard is also introduced into the IRMS by means of the continuous flow system. The measurement is carried out according to the specific protocol for each kind of equipment.

  1. Calculations

The intensities for m/z = 44, 45, 46 are recorded for each sample and reference material analysed in a series of measurements. The 18O/16O isotope ratios are then calculated by a computer, using the IRMS apparatus’ software, according to the principles explained in point 6.1. In practice, the 18O/16O isotope ratios are measured against a working solution previously calibrated against the V-SMOW. Changes in the instrumental conditions while measuring on line may entail small variations. If this occurs, the δ 18O of the samples must be corrected according to the difference in the δ 18O value from the working solution and its assigned value, which was calibrated beforehand against V-SMOW. The correction that is applied to the samples varies in a linear fashion with respect to the values of the two working solutions that precede and follow the samples. Indeed, the working solution must be measured at the beginning and at the end of all sample series. A correction can therefore be calculated for each sample using linear interpolation between two values (the difference between the assigned value and the measured value of the working solution).

The final results are presented as δ18OV-SMOW values expressed in ‰.

δ18OV-SMOW values are calculated according to the following equation:

The δ18O value normalized with respect to the V-SMOW/SLAP scale is calculated according to the following equation:

The δ18OV-SMOW value accepted for SLAP is -55.5‰ (see point 5.1).

  1. Validation of the method

An international collaborative study was carried out (Thomas and Jamin, 2009) for validation of the method.

The repeatability limit (r) is, on average, 0.15‰.

The reproducibility limit (R) is, on average, 0.54‰.

The data and results of the international collaborative study are presented in Annex A.

  1. Bibliography
  • OIV-MA-AS1-08: Reliability of analytical results (Resolution 5/99)
  • OIV-MA-AS1-09: Protocol for the design, conducts and interpretation of collaborative studies (Resolution 6/2000)
  • OIV-MA-AS2-12: Method for 18O/16O isotope ratio determination of water in wines and must
  • IUPAC Protocol in W. Horwitz, Pure Appl. Chem. 67 (2) (1995) 331
  • Thomas, F., Jamin, E. (2009). (2)H NMR and (13)C-IRMS analyses of acetic acid from vinegar, (18)O-IRMS analysis of water in vinegar: International collaborative study report. Analytica Chimica Acta, 649, 98-105

Annex A: Results of the international collaborative study

 

This document sets out the results of the study for the validation of the method of analysis of the 18O/16O ratio of water in wine vinegar (Thomas and Jamin 2009).

The study was carried out in accordance with documents OIV-MA-AS1-08 and OIV-MA-AS1-09.

  1. Participating laboratories

14 laboratories participated in the study:

Bundesinstitut für Risikobewertung, Berlin

Germany

Central Science Laboratory, York

United Kingdom

Custom Technical Laboratory, Prague

Czech Republic

Chemical Institute of the Hungarian Customs and Finance Guard, Budapest

Hungary

Eurofins, Nantes

France

FEM-IASMA, San Michele all’Adige, Trento

Italy

Joint Research Center, Ispra

Italy

Arbitral Agroalimentario Del MAPA, Madrid

Spain

Landesuntersuchungsamt, Speyer

Germany

Bayerisches Landesamt für Gesundheit und Lebensmittelsicherheit, Wurzburg

Germany

Service Commun des Laboratoires, Bordeaux

France

Service Commun des Laboratoires, Montpellier

France

Service Commun des Laboratoires, Paris

France

Unione Italiana Vini, Verona

Italy

  1. Samples

The study was carried out on 5 double-blind samples: three wine vinegar samples (B, C, D), an alcohol vinegar sample (A) and a wine vinegar sample with 20% of A (Thomas and Jamin, 2009).

For each sample, the δ18C of the water was analysed. The results are indicated in the following table.

  1. Statistical evaluation

Statistical calculations were performed according to the OIV-MA-AS1-09 protocol, which is based on Horwitz’ IUPAC protocol. Outliers were removed in the following way: Cochran tests for removal of the laboratories with the highest variance; single- and pair-value Grubbs tests for individual or paired individual outliers; then more Cochran tests, etc., keeping a proportion of outliers <2/9.  The standard deviations of repeatability (sr) and of reproducibility (sR) were then calculated for each material from valid results pairs from the blind duplicates.

For more information, refer to the publication by Thomas and Jamin, 2009.

Description of the sample

N° of valid results

N° of replicates

δ13C average (‰)

sr (‰)

Repeatability limit r (2.8×Sr) ‰

sR (‰)

Reproducibility limit R (2.8× SR) ‰

A

8

2

-6.96

0.06

0.17

0.22

0.62

B

8

2

-0.86

0.08

0.22

0.21

0.59

C

8

2

-1.38

0.02

0.06

0.2

0.56

B+20%A

8

2

-1.79

0.05

0.14

0.2

0.56

D

5

2

-1.23

0.05

0.14

0.14

0.39

The average repeatability limit (r) was 0.15‰, and the average reproducibility limit (R) was 0.54‰, comparable to the values observed for wine alcohol (OIV-MA-AS2-12).